Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Filmgratis_my Blog.it

BUT FOR OTHERS HOW TO SING / COUNT (SE) in foreign lands? NOMADIC SUBJECTS


Wankun Daniel Vigil
(Universidad Complutense de Madrid)

previous note:

If your ears get these sounds, because it also has rules nomadism -Passports, immigration cards, return authorization, archiving, etc .- and I had to resort to a given voice to a female voice, I hope, to say what I wanted to tell. So it's a voice that conveys a count from a foreign land, through a subject that makes avatar in this world of metamorphoses and changes ... Metaphor, Ricoeur would say, what happens today. Count from a foreign land, a strange voice of a subject missed.



As we have said on many previous interventions, the idea of \u200b\u200bthis conference grew out of academic meetings in which philosophers, psychoanalysts, artists, and get a sign-in various Latin American countries and various regions of Spain have been sharing similar concerns on this subject of miscegenation. My first proposal for the participation titled "Let me tell you, Lima. How to tell / sing (it) in a foreign land? "For various reasons the subtitle became the title and came a new subtitle, Subjects-nomadic or nomadic, as I like. This had to join under more restrictive, but not exclusive or exclusive-psicoanalítca the eyes, proposing this conference, to finally put my statement in this Roundtable devoted to oral narratives, with two previous presentations, that of Michael and Mary-and a subsequent conference Music and Mestizaje.

So my proposal for this Committee will play with this position, completely virtual, where I am, between telling and singing, between psychoanalysis and art. Difficult position in which I find so powerful as the previous interventions such as the following. I hope that this purpose of a link between and another space, it becomes satisfactory.

In the beginning was the Word

proposed Martin Heidegger's famous question "why is there body and not rather nothing?" In his work What is Metaphysics? I would like to start wondering why no word and no more silence? The paradox of this formulation is that I need to formulate words. The other way would be the simple silence, therapeutically Wittgensteinian mode, which proposes the show before, when it becomes meaningless. But even then, he also served the words, as this step which would later have to discard, having attained the desired objective. In a poetic way, my good friend Martin Rodriguez-Gaona it comprised:

Why you love the words / writing about them
Although only to indicate / that there is nothing to say? [i]

should realize that our life is made of words and silences, to say and shut up. We have never experienced the utter silence, because apparently that would lead to death, and we could not tell, at least in person. The answer to this question asked "why the word and not rather the silence would, therefore, the type of response that we could give" Why better breathing and not suicide? "If we're here because we chosen first.

However, it should ask what the are the contexts of use of our word, now is the later Wittgenstein who emerges with the pragmatic use of language games. I confine myself to tell and sing, but from a limited context: the foreigner.

ONCE UPON A TIME .... Or find the subject.

"Who speaks when I say?" told us at the time François Valleys, when we participated in the workshop of philosophical methodology in my years of College in Lima. Who is hiding, and who appears, when I exercise the task of counting? When we started to tell a story, assume certain conventions, like starting, for example, with the words "Once upon a time ..." followed by the central character or characters. But when we were told, narrator and character are connected, intersect, almost co-melt or confused. Are identified or recognized. Note, however, that this identification or recognition is not reciprocal or mutual. I, as subject-narrator narrate pretend that I am someone else when I narrated. I identify with fiction. The subject told, meanwhile, has the ability to interact with the narrator. Here are some of these fictions:

"When my father died, my sisters and I found a handwritten draft of the final message that he wanted to leave us. Began by recalling the history of our two families-his, Ghana, and our mother English, which for him represented an overview of who we were. But then he added: "Remember that you are citizens of the world." We said that whatever place we choose to live, and as citizens of the world, no doubt that we could choose any place that we receive, we must seek leave "Better than we have found [...] This notion of leaving a place" better than we have found "was much of what my father meant by citizenship. It was not only belonging to a community, it was held responsible, along with her, her destiny. [...] Growing up with this father and an English mother [...] I never found it difficult to live with so many such loyalties. Our community was Asante, was Ghana was Africa, but it was (in no particular order) England, the Methodist Church, the Third World. And now, in his final words of love and guidance, my father also insisted that it was all mankind " [ii]

well Who is Kwame Anthony Appiah writes in his Ethical proposing an identity rooted cosmopolitanism or a cosmopolitan patriotism, where we are invited to a globalization of human rights, maintaining the commitment to human dignity and personal autonomy. And how do you accomplish this? Through a cosmopolitan conversation, which concentrates the social character of human beings. Social character is expressed in three ways:

· mutual dependence (we are unable to develop on our own, we need human upbringing, moral and intellectual education and practice of language to be whole persons),
· As an end in itself (we want to relate to others: friends, lovers, parents, children, colleagues , neighbors, etc..), and
· for its instrumental value (many things we value-literature, art, education, money, culture, food, housing, etc. dependent society.)

Who is this that we count? Is someone who realizes that need, want and value to another. How has it come to this? My proposal is to think that this is possible by the nomadic nature of the subject. This reiterates Appiah:

"The nomadic longing is deeply rooted in us. Just about a hundred thousand years out of Africa the ancestors of human beings who now inhabit other continents. It did not take much too long to cover the planet have always been a kind traveler " . [iii]

SUBJECT NOMADES

In academia, the reference to the nomadic subjectivity has a name: Rosi Braidotti, who coined this taking the reference term la pensée nomade nomadic -thought-of Deleuze. Listen to her, with his fictional narrative autobiographical

"I was born in this corner of northeastern Italy that was colonized several times before being finally Italy after the First World War. My family emigrated to Melbourne, along with millions of compatriots. I grew up in the metropolis polycultural of Australia, when the policy of the "White Australia" was replaced by the opposite version of multiculturalism. The great common denominator of all European immigrants was a negative identity, that is not British. This is the context I discovered that, after all, was a European, which is far from being a unique identity, much less a stable identity. [...] I had enough knowledge about the history of Europe to know that this identity has never been a . the mere evidence of countless ghettos where immigrants lived testified diverse and inclusive nature. So, to discover my "Europeanism" was an outward movement and opposed that, far from giving me the security of a sovereign identity, once cured me forever of any belief in the sovereignty. From reading and critical assessment of Foucault's sovereignty, it housing became a cake frosting ingredients of which had already been selected, mixed and baked with great care " [iv]
At this point, should be clear that the proposal on identity is that of a multiple identity, not only or essentialized, but rather unstable Mobile:

"The identity can not be understood as a foundational issue, based on a biological fixed essences , psychological or historical conferred by God. On the contrary, we must consider that identity is constructed in the act itself that presents itself as the anchor point for certain social and discursive practices. Consequently, since this is not the essential question: what is the national or ethnic identity?, But rather, a critical question and Genealogy: how is it constructed? Who built it? Under what conditions? For what purpose? " [v]

The purpose assigned Braidotti is very clear: it has a political purpose:

"The nomadic subject is a myth or a political fiction that allows me to restate the established categories and levels of experience and navigate through them [...] The nomadic consciousness is a form of political resistance to any hegemonic and exclusionary vision of subjectivity. Nomadic consciousness is analogous to what Foucault called the Counter: a way of resisting assimilation or homologation with the dominant ways of representation of self. [...] Accordingly, nomadism refers to the kind of critical consciousness that resists settling in the modes of thought and social behavior encoded. What defines the nomadic state is the subversion of set of conventions, not the literal act of traveling " [vi]

This form of resistance, our author's drift into a series of changes, or transpositions:

· Transpose moral debates: translations
· Transpose difference transactions
· nature Transpose: transplants
· Transpose Subject: transit
· death Transpose: transcendence, and finally
· Transpose the future transmissions.

In this nomadic ethics would [vii] . It is "the ability to adapt and develop suitable instruments for navigation within the changing landscape modern technology, etnificados, widespread globally mediated world" [viii] . The recurrence of the metaphor of territory, cartography, wants to allow us to "situate" think from "a place Specifically, although we fit precisely the ease of moving:

"nomadic subjectivity means crossing the desert with a map is not printed but chanted, as in the oral tradition, is to forget the forgetting and take the trip regardless of destination, and, more importantly, nomadic subjectivity refers to becoming " [ix] .

But what is a map chanted? It is time to approach to this other part of the title.

SONG

Territoriality has to do with music. The music has a de-localized and re-territorializing. Let me explain through an example:

"A child in the dark, gripped by fear, calms humming. Walk, walk and stop in accordance with his song. Lost, or blanket as it can hardly be directed to your song. That tune is like the outline of a stable core and quiet stabilizer and a tranquilizer, within the chaos. It is quite possible that the child, while singing, jumping, speed up or slow its passage, but the song itself is already a jump: jumps from chaos to a principle of order in chaos, but also risks disintegrate. There is always a sound in Aridna thread. Or the song of Orpheus. " [x]

The example is from Deleuze and Guattari, in the chapter of A Thousand Plateaus called" The refrain "-" From ritournelle " in original version. The music, the song that is repeated, the chorus-like Let me tell you, Lima ... - allows the child in this case, leaving the world of chaos to go to an order-of Chaos for the kosmos Greek. But it is a temporary order, he should break that circle of protection again to continue his journey. And the music follows the same path, or rather he follows the path of music: these breaks, silences and sounds, high and low, bass and treble, humming and letter, of pure instruments and vocals.

turn now to the question, parked for a moment what is a map chanted? Is the path that the child is singing that ditty, the refrain. There is a path laid out, printed, given free movement ... is marked by the sound of the experience and the experiences, fears and desires, memories and forgetfulness, the persistence, the refrain, which We return again and again that slight stability that allows us to walk. A few months ago in Puerto Maldonado shared a contemplative dance workshops, and fell into the account, and made them fall to them-how walking is the mix of security and insecurity, to put a foothold and the other in the air, We can not walk two feet in earth-nor, of course, both in the air. And that dance is composed of this: to harmonize our security and insecurity. What is said about the dance, rhythm, also applies to music-experts are in this audience who can correct me if necessary. The nomadic subject, therefore, can jump, dance, singing, walking in the number of identities with which they are engaged. Here's another fictional autobiography:

" [ ...] the history and origin are not the only way to see ourselves and the groups they belong. There are a variety of categories to which we belong together. I can be both Asian, an Indian, Bengali with Bangladeshi ancestry, an American or British resident, an economist, dilettante philosopher, writer, especially in San s CRITO, strong believer in secularism and democracy, male, feminist, heterosexual, a defender of the rights of gays and lesbians, with a nonreligious lifestyle, from Hindu, Brahmin and not not believe in life after death (nor, for that is ask the question, believe in a "previous life"). This is just a small example of the various categories of membership that, under the circumstances, to mobilize and commit " [xi]
The metaphor, however, chanted map , crossing the desert has made me think in that context is not yet developed, or seen so far from his backhand, "that is foreign.

HOW TO SING IN STRANGE LAND?

If you ever lived abroad for some time, we have the pleasant experience of knowing how well we can listen a song of our land when we're far from home, though perhaps closer to the motherland or phratry [xii] -. We even encourage you to sing-and dance-and not merely hearers. The nostalgia gives way to joy, euphoria. It seems that we would not be problematic to sing in a foreign land. However, there are contexts in which it committed to, and as I said, a reference to the desert and chanted map quickly brought me to this context of Psalm 136:

along the canals of Babylon
sat to mourn with nostalgia of Zion
in the willows on its banks
hung our harps.
deported there that we
invited us to sing;
our oppressors, to amuse:
"Sing a song of Zion. "
I sing a song of the Lord
in a foreign land!
If I forget thee, Jerusalem,
that I was paralyzed hand right;
that tongue cleave to my palate
if I do not remember you,
if not put to Jerusalem
at the top of my joys [xiii] .

Can you sing a stranger in a situation of oppression? Can you sing a hostile foreign land? The deportees from Israel to Babylon consider the act of singing as an act of infidelity and neglect to Jerusalem his land, his country, his God. So if that happens, ask to be paralyzed his right hand and not to touch the lyre, hanging on the willows and emit no sound and no, "or that they were sticking your tongue to the palate-not power make a sound and well keep silent. We have here an example where silence is not the word that should be emphasized, the nostalgia overpowering joy, because only the country-not the memory, but being in it, in its land, is the highest their joys. They trust that God will change their sorrow into dance, her mourning gown, as beautifully described in Psalm 29:

"You changed my mourning into dancing,
I removed the clothes of mourning
And clothed me with joy;
why I sing without rest:
Lord, my God, I will give thanks forever "Psalm 29, 12-13.

DREAM AVATAR AND TOTEM: SUBJECT NOMADES SINGING IN STRANGE LAND

I conclude this journey of nomadic subject to this reference to sleep, to dream, I hope that no one would have occurred during this story, if so, ask him to wake up ... 1, 2, 3. And here come the click of the fingers, and again in the auditorium, at this round table, some perhaps wondering what am I doing here?

Wittgenstein wrote to his friend Paul Engelmann in 1917 this sentence:

"Our life is like a dream. But the best times we woke up while we recognize that we dream. However, most of the time remain in a deep sleep. I can not wake myself. I try, my dream body makes movements, but no real moves " [xiv]

Borges radicalized this idea The Circular Ruins, published in their Fictions in 1944, so that the character was dreaming, just understanding that it is only a dream, that someone else is dreaming [xv] . And finally, through the adventure of The Matrix and Avatar of - we Inception - Source , as our language, which I think is a great visual and conceptual proposal that subjects can be nomadic [xvi] .

Five identities, each an avatar of the real subject, which run in parallel at different levels of sleep, someone who dreams, dreaming, dreaming that dream, but with different temporal impact-one minutes at a level equivalent to hours of sleep at a different level, yet, bound in different elements dreams let us know if we dream, as Wittgenstein tells us, "we wake up while we recognize that we dream" or not. In the latter case, a totem, an object that allows us to recognize when we are awake or dreaming.

We nomadic subjects with multiple identities, we address different levels of reality in different, but interconnected with each other, which is also distinct temporal density. In each territory we cover is different, and we agree to travel from an equally diverse in each of the levels. We dare to sing when we recognize that synchronization levels brings hope for a sustainable world, and prefer to remain silent when the oppression, violence, chaos, nonsense is our territory [xvii] , not as inert and complicit silence, but as a Silence makes us aware of our own condition.

nomadic subjects, subjects mestizos, border crossing, jumping to the refrain of a song that flows from their deepest unconscious, those boxes that hopscotch is the world including science, the arts. Subject of many voices, living with other humans, animals, machines and nature. Sometimes we will have fun, and let us jump smoothly from one side to another, sometimes, as I do on this occasion, we will ask for the passport. TOTEM was that my sleep I woke up believing I was in Lima.

Many thanks.


[i] GAONA Rodriguez-Martin (1997), Dance Floor, The Holy Office, Lima. Excerpt from the poem Culinary Arts, p. 9.
[ii] APPIAH, K. Anthony (2007), Ethics identity, Katz, Buenos Aires, pp. 309-310.
[iii] IB., Pp. 311-312.
[iv] Braidotti, Rosi (2004), Feminism, sexual difference and subjectivity nomadic , Gedisa, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bp. 69-70. Here we find the powerful metaphor of "cooking" the subject, an idea that also haunted by our minds to prepare for this day: "Cooking the subject." In this way select, mix, precooked and then give unity can be maintained in the same line of Appiah rooted cosmopolitanism.
[v] IB., P. 206.
[vi] IB., P. 216.
[vii] Braidotti, Rosi (2009), Transpositions. On nomadic ethics , Gedisa, Barcelona. She says in her Afterword: "This book marks an important stop on my long journey through the paths of subjectivity nomad began when, in late 1970, heard in Paris, baffled and amazed "to Deleuze, Foucault and Irigaray. So what now clearly perceived think more opaquely, ie non-unitary subjectivity, complexity and multiplicity were to be the key terms of the next millennium, as would the fear, terror, panic and political ethics and the hesitant technological and cultural advances. Instead of falling into habits of thought sedimented institutionalized by the philosophical traditions of the past, I have proposed a leap forward into the complexities and paradoxes of our time. The project to create new concepts and practices of ethical subjectivity in the aftermath of postmodernism, amid the return of the guiding narrative of genetic determinism and neo-liberalism, is a challenge that humanity projected to somewhere between a future that no one can guarantee and a fast pace of progress that in turn calls for a possible future ", IB., p. 357-358.
[viii] IB., P. 377.
[ix] Braidotti (2004), p. 66.
[x] Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (2002), thousand plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia . Pre-Texts, Valencia. 5th ed., P. 318.
[xi] SEM, Amartya (2007), Identity and Violence. The illusion of destiny, Katz, Buenos Aires-Madrid, pp. 43-44.
[xii] As Caetano Veloso: "Language is my country / And I have no homeland, has Matra And I phratry" in su Language theme.
[xiii] Psalm 136, 1-6. Psalm, however does not end there, though for the liturgical rites used only these verses, "continues in a shattering:
"Lord, do not forget what they said
Edomites the day he fell Jerusalem
'Arrásenla, arrásenla to the ground'
Babylon, city criminal
happy to pay you the evil we have done, happy
you hold your children
and crash against the rock "Psalm 136, 7-9.
[xiv] Letter to Paul Ludwig Wittgenstein Engelmman of 09/04/1917. In Wittgenstein, Engelmann (2009), Pre-Textos, Valencia, p. 39.
[xv] This concludes Borges: "He walked toward the sheets of fire. They did not bite his flesh, they caressed him and flooded him without heat or combustion. With relief, with humiliation, with terror, he understood that he too was an illusion, that someone else was dreaming him. "
[xvi] I assume knowledge of the plot of these films, especially Inception.
[xvii] could find an additional pathway, such as singing a song in a strange land stranger in our own language. I think the action of Latino migrants in the U.S. to sing the American national anthem in Castilian. On this BUTLER, Judith, and SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty (2009), Who sings the nation-state? Language political affiliation, Paidos, Buenos Aires.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Performa Washer Spin Cycle Belt On Craigslist

THE INVENTION OF THE PURITY: THE FEAR OF OTHER PROGRAM

Cristina Santamarina

desire is unthinkable from the individuality, is always inter-subjective, and probably , almost as a necessary assumption of departure, we could start by saying that the origin of the social, the big-bang of what we call a society began overflow of desire. Indeed, the social myths originating from the most archaic and individuals to the most institutionalized and spread by religions and ancient and still active, say the origin of the social has to do with an act of violence caused by an overflow of desire of an individual to another, or in his absence, the overflow of desire to a transitional object (of desire) and the consequent guilt associated to this interrelation. In Christianity, in Judaism, to name only those that are closest to us, the effectiveness of guilt is the first case the origin of society, be it the original sin, the loss of paradise or " lack foundational "for standards in psychoanalytic terms, but also more sociological. The desire leads to conflict because it involves joints of violence:

1 º) because it spreads
2 º) because it provokes rivalry
3 º) because it is a model but also as an obstacle in relation
4 º) because its nature introduces the potential of annihilation and its operation and its teaching implies the stakes of fear

... the annihilation of another or others, or oneself because all against all, which could encourage this desire always intersubjective, would result only in the all against one. But after the overflow of desire necessary to establish and institutionalize the idea of \u200b\u200blimits transgressed, the central node of the power of desire, it always appears some mechanism of forgiveness or reconciliation in order to stop the cycle of vengeance threatening.
Under the principle of an eye for an eye, as ancestrally established even in our most primal instincts, we were all blind. Ie you have to recognize our need ontologically other, the other for constituting the subjectivity and to understand that the probability of a historical development requires recognition that lack fundamental, Failing all that separates us both that binds us as social engine. It inaugurates a political sense of history, of that which began with the loss of paradise and a crime among siblings (Cain and Abel) as a principle of humanization albeit in strictly religious terms, and proposing a community relegated as the main sign membership, religation humanizes us inevitable response to the original violence and fear its spread. Faced with this mythical network that immerses us in the insubstantiality of the human condition as a work lofty thought, as the myth of purity or individuality , as being different from the tested species, a pretense of being - or stay - outside the law, to be different from the other and even more different from one another in particular (personal or collective, to historical reasons or not), it is unacceptable . Indeed, the idea of \u200b\u200bdifference, of belonging to a different substance is a cultural claim that although ancient, still lives among us: the Roma consider themselves different from the non-Roma in their beliefs just because they are born without original sin, the idea of an "Aryan race" ideological foundation - anthropological Nazism arose in the nineteenth century when linguists identified the Avestan and Sanskrit and history of the major European languages \u200b\u200bincluding Latin and Greek . Avestan and Sanskrit led them to argue that speakers of those languages \u200b\u200bbelonged to a noble ancient village of ancestor of all European peoples who were given the name of Aryan , taken from the word Sanskrit and Avestan arya meaning "noble." The sometimes mistakenly called Raza Basque was a anthropological term used by historians, writers and ethnographers, even in the nineteenth century . In relation to the Basque Most authors relate the concept of race referring to the current terms of "ethnic " or " people," socio-cultural, mixed it with connotations, and not only on biogenetic definitions. We could go for large areas of the planet usually all that different imaginary fiction PURITY is indicative of each of these cultures to self-refer as substance, as a noun originating as subjects belonging to a personal or collective originality differ other because they do not cover social deprivation, lack, emptiness.
In other words, companies are not together because they belong to a pure identity, homogeneous, Immunization and different from the others, but - instead - to make culture and history of mixtures diversity, heterogeneity, divisions, communities, all of which is always difficult, discordant, subject to divisions of various kinds and degrees. Reading the founding myths of all cultures, the Darwinian evolutionist, or the complex act of navel-gazing should remind us that we come from the other, always others when conflict that has nothing to do with the concept of purity in both that or that which is free and clear of any mixture else, not included any condition, exception or restriction or later or that is exempt from moral imperfections.

I IS OTHER

Personal identity is not insight but multiple interpersonal relationships and in all cases, circumstances of discord rather than harmony. Subjectivity is configured in response to the perception of others that we allocate places on the chain of meanings and raises, always incomplete, the possibility of self-image. To be one it takes at least three, says Oedipus. Say more, three or more and are a symbolic order, ie a micro EXPERIENCE capable of dividing. Because the division is proper social. No intrapsychic conflict is not analyzable in terms of intersubjectivity. But access to the symbolic language, the pronoun I (tu. him, etc..) Is, precisely, a division that, while, gives rise to the subject and splits, separates it without reference to its immediate psychic intimacy. Influenced by his speech to the subject destroys the direct relationship with himself. In the symbolic order the subject is represented by a substitute-yo, self, son ...-. Destroyed the immediacy of the relationship itself, the subject is constructed language, being one and another while

The subject constituted as such by their access to the symbolism but it is not because of him (the creator of that order) but rather as an effect of it. The subject, rather than speaking, is spoken by ... the set of mediations and relationships that constitute it.

said the poet Arthur Rimbaud - "I is another" - admirable in its conciseness density, open to a broad conceptual development: to be "unique", ie, identifiable as a subject in the social order, must be lost in the symbols expressed through whom the "I" always distorted, disguised, scattered in the mirror refracting the other, both signs as being offered as the figures multiplied and repeated for identifications.

After the line opened by Freud, which separates the self from itself is unconscious, an "internal foreign domination" that separates the consciousness of any identity met by "reflection" split and away the subject "true", the self of the enunciation of his ego statement, the imaginary bypass built in the intertwining of the symbolic order looks. Between the self and the self set forth, reflected in the discourse and verbal images, opens a field of fingerprints, populated by all masks and displacement that have been built in relation to others. That "other" of Rimbaud: a limited scale, which requires the third person singular where the reflection of the self is lost without finding bottom. Better still, the background is the insurmountable lack of subject as substance.

The social origins of what there is no substantive identity - totem or god, but there is a conflict, a division, a trauma, an antagonism, a gap that separated the species nature also separates of herself and always integrated whole. If the subject is what has to be absent in the deployment of metaphorical figures, the company is trying not to repair the division, antagonism, a hiatus incolmable between humans, a confrontation that is reproduced, as the heads of Hydra, in the countless nuances of the conflict that populate the social field. What gives rise is not the fullness of a substantial cause but a lack structuring, forming, in which forgetting, remembering and repeating articulates the fate of men. In this context that culture becomes tragic in so far as it has to accommodate all the procedures by which we escape the reality of imagination desires that can not be removed or satisfied.


Indeed, the prohibition of wanting what the other wants (prohibition of action par excellence of all actions, desire) is at the same time legitimizing the existence of desire (a term that exceeds the sum of all actions as only wanting constitutes us as agents and subjects of our biography), from whose social existence is based, always involves some form of violence . And founds articulating the need for social responsibility of discord, to answer the complexity of living otherness, living with the other proposing the passage of the POLIS OIKOS, community to society (because none of us is immune to the same at the common (because we can not have everything) , home to the city (because we need the law and pardon), from the particular to the general (I am not without projecting beyond my borders, of selfhood itself to the inclusion of other ( a different, distinct, and by definition, threatening) because that one, those others are different being equal, are equal, are different. From the notion of sameness of selfhood to the extent that the only possibility of an I, is the existence of a TU and a HE / SHE, including from other third parties. The inclusion of the other, in short, has required a preliminary step, knowing that without the inter despite the threat of violence, we are not human. Include the other as being different is like taking that involves violence and include it as a subject of desire but also as a contrast (relative to our own possibilities desiring), essentially as an adversary and a threat to the conflict deferred background that binds us and which is none other than the fear of indiscriminate violence.

From this view of origin, will be easier to understand that the social is always hinged on how to divide, to the point of recognizing that this division constitutes and social structuring : the structure of power structure always forms division. The social is a construct that external unfounded and therefore open to change, transformation, new forms of division. Or in other words, there is a social construct out of time because the social history is not a substance, not us human is but a process. It has no social basis and doomed to a constant search for fulfillment as only in this framework can be understood insubstantiality social conflict, discord (and even violence) to others.

The mixture becomes, - both from the perspective of the subject as the social - not so much a desire consciences thinking, progressive and kind, but a structuring principle of humanization without which we would be sentenced to two possibilities: to disappear from the planet for real extinction (annihilate each other), or diluted in all the other species nature (leaving the vector orientation of the humanization). But in the same way that we can not satisfy the desire or delete it, we can not do without the other, the other or be without them, we incorporate the paradox in the same way of understanding and conception of international relations and intrasubjective as a third means inclusive, including understanding of the history

From this notion of the subject and the social and structural divisions and space structuring thinking about the relationship with others requires not only liquidate any , a criterion of purity (personal or group) but assume that in two dimensions what emerges is a double bind, paradoxical link between the subject and others, between the social and its divisions traversed by the violence of undecidability.

For the constitution of the subject and for the future of the social will be THE OTHER, THE OTHER as subjects of plurality: BE A ONE TIME SAME AND DIFFERENT. DIVERSITY IS ONE OF THE SOCIAL SUPPORT WHILE THE CONSTANT THREAT. (As in personal relationships, which are interpersonal, that should be equal but different between subjects to interact, the identity WHO personnel is the result of a set of differences with the other, allowing a narrative and logic of implicit relational self. In THE PLOT AS SOCIAL HISTORY no greater exercise of violence that will renounce violence involved in this scheme to accept that there ACTORS AND ACTIONS BUT NO AUTHOR, nobody has written the script for what's coming, SO ONLY IS WE THINK about where we come from and how we do.





Sunday, September 26, 2010

Cheat For Master Ball Pokemon Silver Vba



Here are some exercises review what they have learned in math item 1:

another page in this are seven tabs that you do a puzzle hitting questions. Sure you is easy.


Street Value Of Oxycocet



Ideas are like fish. If you want to catch little fish, you can stay in shallow water. But if you want to catch a big golden fish, you have to delve into deeper water. In the deep, the fish are more powerful and pure. They're huge and abstract. And very beautiful. Everything, anything, emerges from the deepest level. Modern physics at that level called unified field. The more it expands consciousness, the more you profunudiza to the source and the greater the fish that can be fished.


Transcendental Meditation leads you into an ocean of pure consciousness, pure knowledge. But it sounds familiar, you are. Immediately a feeling of happiness emerges: No goofy happiness, but of deep beauty.


Cinema is a language. You can say things: big, abstract. And I love that. Not always give me good words. Some people are poets and say things with beautiful words. But the film has its own language. And he can say many things because you have the time and sequence. You dialogues. You have music. You have sound effects. You have many tools. And, therefore, can express a feeling or a thought that could not communicate otherwise. It is a magical medium.


When I catch a idea for a movie, I fell in love the way that cinema is able to express it. I like stories containing abstractions and that's what movies can do.


One idea is a thought. It is a thought that spans more than you think when you think. But at the initial instant a spark. You fall in love the first idea, a tiny piece. And as you do, the rest comes with time.


Within every human being is an ocean of vibrating consciousness, pure. In transcendental meditation, when you transcend you dive into that ocean of pure consciousness. Wade in it. And glory. A glory that makes you vibrate. Pure consciousness experience stimulates, expands. Begins to unfold and grow.


Life is full of abstractions and the only way to understand it is through intuition. Intuition is to see the solution: see it, know it. Is the union of emotion and intellect. Within us all there is an ocean of consciousness and is an ocean of solutions. When you dive into that ocean, in that awareness, you stimulate it. Do not dive in search of specific solutions, you jump to stimulate the ocean of consciousness.


Many people have experienced transcendence, but may not know. It is an experience you can have just before bedtime. You are awake, but experience a kind of fall and you may see a white light and feel a small jolt of happiness. And you say: Wow. And when you go from a state of consciousness to another, eg from wakefulness to sleep, you cross a gap. And in that vacuum, you can transcend.


If that begins to grow within us, light a light that affects the environment. Entering a room where they are discussing is not pleasant. Even when the discussion is over, still hangs in the air. But if you enter a room where someone has just meditate, and notes that this is very enjoyable. We all conditions on our environment. If you enjoy that inner light and brightness powers increasingly, also will enjoy more. And that light will reach farther and farther.


coexist is interesting to observe how things are in principle not related. That makes one wonder. How do when they seem so far away? This conjures up a third thing that most unites the first two. It is a struggle to discover how you can operate the unit in the midst of diversity. The ocean is the drive where things float.


deeply love movies, I love fish and I love to ponder ideas. I am excited to encourage unity. And I think that stimulation of the unit brings a better life. Perhaps the light is still far away, but they say that when you walk into the light, every step you take things shine brighter. For me, every day is better. And I believe that encourage unity in the world will bring peace to the land.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Canada Jobs For Backpackers




Karl Rossman, sixteen, was sent to America by his parents because a maid had seduced him and would have had his child. On landing, notes that he has forgotten his umbrella in the cabin. Asks a friend to look after the bag while the umbrella back. Lost the way and just next to the ship's fireman, who immediately Karl begins to talk about their problems. The fireman has a conflicted relationship with their work and conditions. Karl agrees with the problem and insists fireman intercede for him with the authorities of the boat. Is brought before the authorities and improvises a speech in favor of the stoker. However, the stoker does not seem very convincing at the time to present their own defense. The situation created is tense. Unexpectedly, Jakob (one of the high command of the ship) claims to be the uncle of Karl. The unresolved status of the stoker is displaced by the unusual meeting.


Jakob, Karl's uncle, takes charge of his nephew. Their economic situation is excellent. Karl gradually settles into its fortunate and unexpected new life marked by luxury and comfort. Jakob teaches your business, your lifestyle. Pollunder presents to a friend. Pollunder invites Karl to his country house. Jakob is reluctant to give permission to Karl, but agrees with Karl's insistence on going to the cottage Pollunder. Once there, Karl meets Klara, daughter of Pollunder and Mr. Green, a friend who has just unexpectedly go visit. Karl does not like Mr. Green and Klara not sit well. Karl is going through a veiled disgust. Karl wants to return. Mr Green says he has important news for Karl, but must wait until midnight. It is Jakob's letter which says that for him desobecido, Karl and should not return to it, it will not be well received.


Mr. Green is available to Karl and never recovered the suitcase open that Karl would have been shipped. The case of Karl is now his entire fortune. Karl will have to start from scratch. In a small-time tavern, he met Robinson and Delamarche, planning to travel to Butterford, hoping to get a job. Karl can go with them, if desired. His questionable friends have no qualms about using the money to Karl, promising to replace it in the future. Karl and lets them make the journey. On one occasion, his friends Karl force the suitcase in his absence. Karl discovers, with horror, the photo has disappeared from their parents. The incident not like it to Karl, who finally broke with his fellow travelers. The head chef of a hotel where he has gone in search of food is very nice to Karl and invites him to stay. Karl is admitted as an elevator in the hotel and may have a shared room with other employees of the hotel.


After some time, Robinson's entire fortune and decides pestering Karl, while Karl is still in service. Asks for money, it annoys. Robinson shows signs of being drunk. Decomposes. Karl wants to assist and to do, is absent without leave from his post for a few minutes, with the misfortune of being caught by his superior. Karl Robinson would have led to his room, where he clashed with Karl roommates. Karl accused. The head chef finds the entire incident, Karl is in serious trouble. Karl decided to fire immediately. Soon, the discredited Karl is on the street and, last but not least, should be responsible for Robinson, mistreated by his aggressive roommates. Karl hire a taxi to take him home Robinson. Robinson now lives with Delamarche, which has an affair with a singer in decline.


Karl has no money to pay the taxi. Police intervention, Karl flees. Delamarche interceding on their behalf and invites him to stay with them at home Brunelda. Apparently Delamarche Brunelda's boyfriend and Robinson became the assistant or servant Brunelda. Karl Robinson wants to replace him in this arduous task. Brunelda temperament is unbearable. Karl does not know anything. However, you can not leave the department. Withheld against their will. Karl tries to escape, but can not. For now, Karl seems resigned to go there. Night falls. While others sleep, Karl speaks from balcony to balcony with a neighbor, a student, which puts aware of their situation. The neighbor advised to reconsider the offer you have made. Perhaps, after all, not a bad idea to stay there as a servant. Karl ignores him, but then discovers that Brunelda is really unbearable. Moody, hysterical, whimsical. Karl feels miserable.


posthumous fragment (incomplete):
Karl warns a sign on the street where recruit interested to join the great theater of Oklahoma. The poster says that anyone applying for a position will be admitted. Karl is presented there. Have turned the race track in an office with staff deployment of immense proportions. However, apparently there are only two applicants for employment, counting it himself. Karl should have been submitted for your records, but have forgotten. He invents a fictitious name because it distrusts the good faith of the company, but then repents. Apparently, the great theater of Oklahoma is a reputable company. At least delivers what it promises. Karl is hired and meets an old colleague from the hotel at the welcome luncheon. Within minutes, leave the train to Oklahoma.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Bicycle Mold For Cake

living


continue to learn things from living things. Make this activity and discover new groups of living things and what are the cells.

Struts For Jeep Liberty

America Terminal City


Number One: Cosmo Quinn, formerly known as The Human Fly, recalls his glory days while suspended in the highest , performing their usual work, which consists of cleaning the glass in the windows of buildings. As Human Fly, Cosmo Quinn came to enjoy fame and prestige, but his personal life became corrupted by the effect of waste and of drug addiction experimental power. His colleagues and friends were also corrupted. As Terminal City, his hometown. While the mind of Cosmo Quinn flows between memories and thoughts, doors inside the building Herculean Arms is a high-society meeting. Suddenly, Cosmo Quinn is torn from his inner world to be surprised by the sight of a chase. Two guys who look like thugs chasing another carrying a briefcase. The arrival of a train air, precipitates an accident that sidetracked the persecutors and the persecuted throws fall through the window that Cosmo was cleaning. The type of case you are lucky enough to fall just above a large cake that softens the impact. Cosmo slides right into the party. Apparently, the type of case has not suffered any damage. Inside, Cosmo is casually Caridad, who was linked romantically when his life was different. The type of case not remember who he is or why he pursued. Not even know what is the case, which remains chained to his wrist. Try to force the lock of the case, but the scientist of the hotel ensures that case is done with some kind of inviolable material of extraterrestrial origin. Cosmo is sure he had seen earlier in the case. Even he is convinced that within the case lies the secret that could unlock the mystery of what killed his career. Think seriously unravel this mystery, but is not the only one interested in the case and its competitors do not think releasing prey. A distinctive character which is to make a monster mask behind his punches, he temporarily left out of combat Cosmo. Big Lil, the most feared gangster in the city, was hired to steal the briefcase. But there are also two curious French deduct the great value that should be inside the case and strive to try to achieve. Moreover, Habib (a strange secret agent), chases and Big Lil Alacazar former dictator will do anything to regain the jewel that is, is within the briefcase. Just as Big Lil seems poised to be the case, appears in the mysterious and intimidating scene known as Monique righteous Rome, driving back Big Lil in their aims. Cosmo Quinn decides to dust off his old suit and enter human fly again on the scene, saving the type of case the danger and making it safe. Although, once safe, the type of case gets drunk at a bar and, on waking, he discovers that his briefcase is gone.


Number Two:
Cosmo Quinn remembers the good old days. Think of those who were his colleagues: Kid Gloves (boxing) Monty Vickers (browser), Eno Orez (Man of a Thousand Faces). Monty Vickers was, without doubt, the most successful of all. Extraordinary showman and businessman. Stay up to date with the latest flavor of the moment. His career was meteoric, but his partner DiMappe the suggestion of the ambitious businessman and mafia Nero Black, would have betrayed him and never heard about the whereabouts of Monty Vickers. Meanwhile, Nero Black suffers against the corrupt mayor, who agreed would be the case disappeared. Cosmo Quinn seeks replacement to continue with his job of cleaning windows and BB, a young newcomer to the city, decides to accept the job. BB would Terminal City went to work in the company that belonged to his father, but that company no longer exists. Now serves as the basis of secret operations Nero Black. Surprisingly, Monty Vickers returns, download revenge against those who betrayed him. Kid Gloves is placed on their side. Then Kid Gloves Vickers wants back in the ring. Has planned a comeback. It occurred to compete against evolution Kid Gloves: Vickers has managed to capture of various specimens of early man, who put in the ring to compete against Kid Gloves. BB rents a cheap room and her apartment is tucked away in a strange necklace. This is the necklace that chased the former dictator of Alacazar. Black Nero learns the return of Monty Vickers and Orez Eno asks to take charge of it. The return of Monty Vickers and Kid Gloves is a resounding success.


Three:
Habib is on the trail of Monique Rome, but Monique has fallen into the hands of Big Lil, who has also kidnapped Hope, Sister of Charity with whom he tries to make a deal. Lil Big Charity supposed to know the whereabouts of the type of case and wants the case in exchange for his sister. Due to the success of his show, Monty Vickers decided to go one step further and plans to compete against a robot Kid Gloves. BB tries to sell the jewelry that has been found, but the jeweler tells you honestly have no idea of \u200b\u200bthe true value of the jewel and keep it advised. Cosmo Quinn, dressed in his suit, Human Fly, Hope rescues from the clutches of Big Lil. Then Habib chasing Big Lil and persecution turns into an accident kills Big Lil. Orez Eno is about to kill Monty Vickers, but is rescued at the last minute by Monique Rome. Kid Gloves beat the machine, but died after the fight. Quinn thinks Cosmo Terminal City is a city impredescible. Melancholic and strange. The garbage truck makes its usual route. One employee is a strange case in one of the cubes garbage. Upon opening the case to substantiate the content area, a twinkle in her eyes in an unusual way.