Blog Franson Coordtrans

NG

Xóchitl Romo

Miscegenation in racial terms, is perhaps the most obvious way to think about otherness. One becomes hopelessly in the relationship or engagement with other cultures, other languages, other accents, other worlds.

On the one hand say that there is a sort of awful truth for speaking being is revealed in the Other abroad. But the unconscious is structured into several languages \u200b\u200b(llanguage) no need to talk. So the metaphor of other people, even strangers that are their languages, can have effects on us. Another thing comes to propose several trips to our great enigmas. "I refused at first as barbarous superimposed transforms to brilliant shine to the body as" The difference is rejected then be bright. Us anything about those who are different.

miscegenation For psychoanalysis is not just about race, it is the territory of the subject. Subjectivity is drawn from this relationship mixed with horror, mystery and brightness with the Other.

try to place the meaning of otherness to psychoanalysis. Beginning with a fragment of text Lacan asks me for some time:

Lacan says:

¨ ... although in this race after the truth is not only alone, but not it is all true when touched, yet none touches but by the Other ¨

How can we understand this? ... it seems that if there is a really unique and different for each subject, psychoanalysis must be built in an act that requires the other. That is, as the three prisoners who speaks Lacan, can not be established on the trial itself but through the colors and the movements of others. No inmate may go free yourself.

According to Ricardo Saiegh s three prisoners on how the three strands braided after six crossings in turn connects to your home ends (knot delete meo) ... well, after the appearance of each thread rediscovers its initial identification beats the difference ...

For psychoanalysis if the subjects are in prison, they are with respect to a structure that is based on a collective twisted logic.

His mixing is inevitable and if the subject is intertwined with the desire that comes from others, or, the Other no more than a struggle for pure prestige. There will be no more than suffering too much.

therefore against the evil of love, against claims of what you gave me, which I took, what I deserve; against the certainty or demand compensation and deal with excessive complaints about the fact that life never do anything you want, the analyst can not hesitate to propose leaving the relief will be thought of in isolation, the operation to be carried out after assuming that if it is white, is because others are or were.

But all this can be said or taught as a theory class taught at the University.

suggest reading some excerpts of testimony on the tour by an analysis:

One analyst writes:

My first encounter with the analysis helped me to get rid of terrible troubles linked to a destination loss. It is no small thing and I am grateful.

But meet hard and live castration, had to cross the sea of \u200b\u200bthe Other.

The meeting with my second analysis was a radical confusion. To my surprise, this analyst does not make concessions, nor was pleased with my story ... did not have, nor cared to enjoy with my counts exploits ¨ ¨ and my passions. He was not interested nor my complaints or my great suffering and disappointment. He just ask for the reasons and motives of my partner: Why does he do this or that?

I must say that the first few months out of your query very disoriented, thinking, this analyst or hear me or let me associate freely, or make me case, neither cares ... and yet again each session to meet with that other white of my story, the analyst signal located not in the big questions but in the most everyday and then it seemed too common, and known and to some extent irrelevant, but I will say now, after the coup, quite close and crucial.

This once the couch is about linking to another ... the Other who embodies every day that the one he says ¨ good morning, good night, you coming to dinner?, And broke, can I have a kiss?, and also, what bastard or dirty and heavy you ... ¨

The position of the analyst who insisted on questioning once again on the minimum movements of the other, had become an absolute mystery that may not previously looked for fear of uncertainty. Better think you already know the next door, there are no surprises, which is an alter ego and not an absolute Other.

is not to be as familiar as strange, but it now known was supposedly exceptional. With the questions in the discussion as usual, the trip to the mysteries began: what is the desire of the Other? What is the desire of the Other?, Is not that also the question of one's own desire?, Had waited long for me that question!

one day I found myself thinking, then there is something beyond mere dissatisfaction wailing of a woman: there is the question by the Other.

analyst's ethics was that, without respite, he ran towards recognizing the desire and receded in each session, beginning with the first, the desire for recognition.

...

" not involve this little snippet of witness something like that for Freud's narcissism is the underpinning of sexuality narcissism?

We will say that, on this evidence there is a moment to realize the other, a time to question the desire of the Other and a time to take the final of the loop on the single desire. I'm so white.

... I own the

Saiegh claim that before the analysis is the predominant me who thinks he can realize his goal of absolute mode, at one time and in isolation: when in the analysis, we know, is built in parts at different times and referring others.

Without tying the truth from another, there is, again, suffering in excess: ¨ No truth itself is reached, but for others ¨ ... Did not we say that psychosis is something des-tied? and what are not neurotic experts fix everything in silence or in the case without addressing a question to another?

Thus, the subject for psychoanalysis is, mestizo, transitive, and trans-trans.

Lacan insists on this aspect at different times, in 55 it reads: The analysis is in made aware of their relationship (...) with all those others who are the real guarantors, and has not recognized. This is the subject gradually discover what really goes further without knowing it ...

Is not perhaps this is to be tied to others, what you think Oedipus Freud when he postulates? Not Oedipus the knot which makes the role of law as is the desire of the father by the mother? Is not the child is mixed race between two worlds and two sexes?

knots Returning clinic could then say that a parent is tied to a woman who wants a child, a child is tied to a father who wants a mother and a mother is tied to a child who throws a his father asks.

're at it, we can also say that a woman is tied to a man who insists his desire and, in turn, a man is tied to the relationship between a woman and a puzzle: ¨ not reached the truth but by the Other ¨

Perhaps we can understand the approach, core on which Lacan's father at 75. He says A father is entitled to respect and love, rather than if (...) is (...) versement pere-oriented, ie if a woman makes a tiny object that causes desire. (...) It does not matter (the father) have symptoms if you add them (...) that their cause is a woman he has managed to make children and that these, like it or not, provide them with paternal care ... ;

This desire of the father, not their consistency Ideal but his desire is the desire to accompany the child on their own subjective way: The compass that the subject has to hold his own desire is the desire that preceded it, and oriented analysis touches on this path of a further desire.

Beyond complaints about a father who failed, there is the question: what about the father, why he wanted this woman? What about the mother?

say this is essential because sometimes it seems that the analysts we forget that for psychoanalysis of sexuality is fundamental and generations are linked in sex. So what I want above us and how we link to it?, What color we have in the back?, What color are our parents?, What color our children?, What color's partner? Are not these questions that are displayed in a psychoanalysis?

...

Another analyst writes in her attempt to convey the experience of analysis:

the beginning ... the suffering that leads to the analysis helps us to give up the symptoms, often very quickly . It seems as if easy, sometimes going so fast that it seems like witches. Subsequently, when silence is another thing.

One day you realize that ¨ say everything, everything that occurs to you ¨, not to say any nonsense.

This was drying my sermons whiners. ..

Sometimes I thought that the authority of my father would kill me, others, the castle of my mother made her ridiculous ...

But to reconcile with the footprint of a lineage was to accept a world of limits

Rebuilding a story on an analysis ... is not the same as registering as a subject in a genealogy.

complaints ultrasounds want to open a hollow. The downside is that it can be a cliff ...

if we drill to me ... Would be the only captivating look at an ideal, can truly live a relationship with the desire, the only fact the only man or woman who is the only one who can interpret their own truth, and of course the single who is an analyst. It would be like having achieved a sculpture of himself, a dream of Superman against a background of moral beauty ...

But there in the analysis a strong beyond the Self, who founded a relationship with the symbolic. This falls beyond desire in a life project conceived as a question constantly raised with regard to the other and their difference.

...

This one can cut out a moment of silence to stop complaining, time to think the father calmed against the mother and a time to be included in this genealogy of desire which raises the question about the difference. I'm so white.

The effect of tying the other, there will be full and eternal happiness, but perhaps further confidence that more than the demand (ie you need, but not asked to complete it) and that the person wants to turn that desire (ie, living through the void in the Other that constitutes and drives).

...

therefore propose to emphasize the fact that an analysis does not work properly for escape free or a dream of love as the rebels, in the sense of becoming autonomous and independent, but perhaps in order to assume, that one can not sexuality alone and that if we go to the other is also unknown to be part of a lineage and desiring mestizo, or, in other words, will have to inquire whether an analysis makes it possible to appropriate what has been transmitted to each one in relation to the desire ... just in case the route on the couch makes it possible appropriate the legacy of the metaphor that corresponds to each one. This heritage is the legacy that includes the infinite mystery of the cause alienated the other. It is the legacy of Oedipus.

About this happens if you pass psychoanalysis:

if it happens, that is, if it happens that there

analysis ... if it passes, ie, whether to approve because it is well informed and practical ...

If it does, that is, if the clinic is transmitted among analysts as a research method ...

Then, it will be alone with our truth, but will not reach its horror and its brightness mestizo, but by others.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• COSTELCADE A. and others, ¨ become a psychoanalyst. The formations of the unconscious ¨, Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 1999.

• Freud, Sigmund, narcissism ¨ Introduction ¨ Complete Works Volume XIV, Amorrortu Editori, Buenos Aires, 2000.

• Lacan, Jacques

2 ¨ The Seminar I in Freud's Theory and Psychoanalytic Technique ¨ Editorial Paidós, Argentina, 2001.

The Seminar 10 ¨ Anguish ¨ Paidós Editorial, Argentina, 2006.

The seminars · RSI ¨ Critical version of the Freudian School of Buenos Aires, Argentina , 1989.

¨ logical time and the assertion of anticipated certainty. A new sophism ¨ Writings 1, Editorial Siglo XXI, Mexico, 1998.

• Saiegh, Ricardo,

Enigmas of the Unconscious ¨ ¨ Quantor Essays, Madrid 1989.

truth be ¨ ¨ ¨ in question of truth and transmission Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic clinic Days XVIII ¨. Editorial Vision Books, Madrid, 2009.