Saturday, April 30, 2011

Calories In Smithfield Bbq Coleslaw



.
.
.
.

"The first thing instead of throwing an arrow at the enemy threw
insulting the founder of civilization."


Sigmund Freud;
"On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena "SET III, 1893.


"You get sick when you are not happy."

Ingmar Bergman;
for the script of his pupil Billie August: "With the best intentions. "

sentenced
As Heidegger, we are inhabited by the language, that language is not an instrument of man, but who live in it: he is sooner. And since we are discussing here before us poem poets. This subtlety cover the subject. Subtlety indeed facing linguists, to science and those who insist on proclaiming that it is through language that humans can communicate, understand what it is. The subject, precisely because the language has lost all possible communication attempt; remember the teacher Lacan: "one speaks to is not what you do not know." Ergo, the first conclusion hitting reads: the subject does not speak to communicate, the subject is a pleasure speaking because pushing it, because the unconscious is determined and then, talking, enjoying . (Definition of the unconscious that Lacan offers us in the twentieth seminar, yet.)

Understanding this Lacanian maxim involves first understanding the invention Freudian unconscious and clinical work at the condition of the hysteric. What our teacher discover Vienna? That mortification ( Krankung ) has the same root disease ( Krankheit ) and that the processing is given by the symbol: the hysterical symptom-o neurotic symptom has any significant structure (" the metaphor of the repressed " one of the first definitions of Lacan). The symptom, how metaphor hides a word, to be more strict, we might anticipate that it is "the tip of the real." Why? Because, as Lacan said analysts do not linguistic but Lingua (H) hysteria, and, therefore, for us there is no language, or rather, language is bored by the endless line of the phallus. Instead, there is the neologism invented by Lacan: llanguage all along: to signify that adult neurosis is nothing but the neurosis and child (forgive the tautology here) and read from the text of the analysand are babbling, the lalación of infans, projected to the vagaries of the pitch, the failed, trips; In short, everything that science becomes "noise": the charlataría, the gossip, the balls around. Hence Lacan defines analysis as "the practice of nonsense." That llanguage , we said, is what allows us to speak of Echoes of the Other, ie: the one leading the drive. (" The drives are the echo of that in the body there is a saying " Lacan dixit.) The drive, which Another comes from, and not as some Freudians insist internal mistaking instinct-is-bait in each singularity. Thus psychoanalysis, through the scaffolding, it tries to approach the case by case basis, ie each parlêtre the symptom and not the house diagnostic manuals for the general case. What Freud discovered it? The symptom of the hysteric-1 is not the same as that of the hysteric-2, because they have two different llanguage, but that-while-we can operate with both because they have something in common: "... suffering reminiscences. "

If the neurotic suffers from memory it requires us think the analysis as a device-as once said Roberto Harari - allowing us to forget and not remember. Forget what? The enjoyment that supersede the symbol. The neurotic is ill because an excess of enjoyment it has infested. Lacan says: " the only thing you can be guilty is to yield to the desire ." That is the main evil-the super-ego, with its mandate always monotone (" Enjoy!") Made to suffer . The subject has, therefore, it is usufruct (use this term to remember here that Lacan takes the case) an enjoyment that is beyond their ability processing.

What desire? We know the importance of words that hide music, the voice of another re-ring in the body (and not only infans dies sine qua non but will "speak for the other view), of the importance of non-metallic voice, that has not only care nurses style (remember the hospital) but the word fits the dynamics of desire that is played in the link of the subjects. Desire is the only scaffold from which you can cope with the drive (it's always drive-of-death drive there is no dualism in the clinic) and the building where else? in the analytical device (" Desire is its interpretation "-Lacan) so the word, the only" bridge "between analyst and analysand based on the powers of the transfer, is the" new order "underpinned by the clinician Vienna for the analytical operation is not a mere hypnosis but a buckling of signifiers. Word processing by Freud has named association-free and may only be constituted when his sister, -floating attention (ie, the analyst's desire) plays a role.

In short: first, the arrow, war, drive, enjoyment. On the other hand, the symbol, desire, the ghost as a defense to that enjoyment impossible. The neurotic sometimes often - acting through metonymy-desiring, break that is why we say that the only two desires that may be performed include the parricide and incest, without being able to accept (as we call it castration) that the slippage will occur, after all, inevitably, cutting corners on the side of beyond-the-top-of-pleasure and paying, then the consequences of the act.

If, as Freud wanted to, the disease is a tribute to the enjoyment (mazoquístico) pays to the body, or, in the words of O. Masotta, " the subject is ill because they want to know that there is to know about the sexual "then we can surmise, praxis means that in the absence of words, the neurotic vague, like the Flying Dutchman, searching for, tirelessly ... Our offices in the daily show us that these words flow into the same river in a single noun, adjective most often: LOVE. So Lacan has delivered something less enigmatic: " The only thing that always talks in an analysis is love ..." Many times the analysis, by wire transfer, you can get the drift - remember that drive is Trieb - anchored in fruition. That is, can transform into a symbol or arrow, as once the word of Freud responded, " neurotic misery misfortune everyday."

A. Marcelo Perez




.

0 comments:

Post a Comment