.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
"The true formula of atheism is not God is dead (Nitschze)-although found the origin of the father's role in his murder, Freud protects the father, the true formula of atheism is God is unconscious." Jacques Lacan
who are carriers of the faith, is not usually responsible for his act, especially if the mechanism involved means abandoning its pro Being in a Random Fate or Luck is cast.
Let's see: someone can have faith today and tomorrow to reconfirm the faith that enabled him to overcome obstacles and have what we now have: happiness. But it turns out, our narcissism always makes us put things in our view, that shortly after the daily matters worse and worse every day. Who is bearer of the faith can not think that is why yes. Should continue to have faith at least to justify (se). So should anyone think that I wanted . Must be a genuine religious : a real religious also boasts its share without asking more legitimate, the dogma is this: go down the street, sees a beggar asking for coins and what makes a legitimate religious? Nothing, because its reasoning bears the mark of someone I wanted So, would help banish-remove-the reason for that someone . A truly religious to be reasoning: is lucky to be so . Faith begets this tactic of mysterious aura that surrounds both the dogma and the destination. So I wanted someone means that for some That Somebody ruled that the luck will change: first to test the subject to the same faith. Then, to sustain it.
now. In psychoanalysis luck is a factor that does not count when you talk, except that one can trivialize the issue and say, " was lucky that he escaped a failed " but that would not believe in the unconscious. If we believed in luck, and circular movements of the planets that dictate our destiny, not believe in the responsibility of each analysand to his act. But we give ourselves permission to say that imagination and faith is the dogma that the desire is to psychoanalysis. Now, the desire is not natural, genetic. Comes from the Other. We taken by desire: the desire has to subject. And herein lies the problem because the subject believes that carrot-which the object is actually ahead and take it (him) from behind. Objects placed in front of the subject are merely screens to lure (him) but the desire to take it from the start.
analysis would, without wishing to simplify everything, not to escape from this desire that we remain and we are determined and for a change of discourse: the I have faith because luck and someday there will be my hand, just have to wait to happen to am responsible for my actions . The neurotic religious per se - escapes to the responsibility because the dogma is always more comfortable: no questions, it is axiomatic. And because responsibility would involve analyzing the narcissism that has led not only to castration and can not blame the fate of his fate, but-often the most hurtful "to accept that the Other also lacks guarantees, or, in the words of Lacan - does not exist. The knowledge of the Other (which he is the neurotic, let's call this namely: science, father, astrology or whatever you want) is anchored in their symptoms. And the neurotic never want to lose: the belief in luck ( the belief in one another without barring ) is the ultimate the neurotic would not lose. Collapsed and there is so-distress by-turns to one analyst, because the Another has failed allowing desired as another. As in the animated film Jacques Tati, the Other is a magician should always take the Subject of the hand to join him in the belief that this guarantee will never lack fantasy and-just so-so real.
finish with a classic joke of the parish Analytics: A man who believes he is a cereal grain is taken to a mental institution where the doctors are doing everything they can to convince him that is not a seed but a man. When man is cured and is allowed to leave the hospital, once again shaking with fear. Outside there is a chicken and is afraid to eat it. "But my friend -le- your doctor says if you know well that there is a grain, but a man ." "Of course I know," replies the patient, "but do we know the chicken?" As Slavoj Zizek concludes : "Psychoanalytic treatment is precisely this: not enough to convince the patient unconscious truth about your symptoms, the unconscious itself must be brought to bear this truth."
marcelo augusto perez
April, 2011.
.
.
Art:
Frames of the film:
The Illusionist
Jacques Tati / 2010. .
0 comments:
Post a Comment